Ingredients: Chai Hu (Bupleurum), Bai Shao (White Peony Root), Dang Gui (Dang Gui), Bai Zhu (White Atractylodes), Fu Ling (Hoelen), Bo He (Mentha), Zhi Gan Cao (Processed Licorice), Sheng Jiang (Ginger)
Clinical Application:
Modifications of this formula was used to treat 30 cases of depression. The modifications were made as follows: for patients suffering from blood stasis and qi stagnation, Dan Shen, Xiang Fu, Wu Yao, Chuan Xiong, and Chi Shao were added; for patients with internal heat due to a long-depressed liver, Dan Shan and Zhi Zi were; for patients with both qi and blood deficiencies, Dang Shen, Huang Qi, Shu Di Huang were added; and for patients with and spleen- and kidney-yang deficiencies, Ba Ji Tian, Xian Mao, Yin Yang Huo, Gan Jiang, Fu Pian, and Ji Nei Jin were added. One unit of treatment lasted 30 days. The treatment featured a 30-day treatment unit, and reported a total effective
rate of 87%.
Zhang, et al. treated 58 cases of depressive neurosis with the classic formula Xiao Yao Wan. A control group of 52 cases was treated with a placebo while the other group took a formula consisting Shan Zha, Shen Qu, and Mai Ya. One unit of treatment was one month for both groups. The results: of the treatment group, 17 cases were resolved, 24 significantly improved, 12 improved, and 5 did not respond to the treatment, with a total effective rate of 91.38%; the corresponding numbers for the control group were 0, 5, 5, 35, and 32.69% (P<0.05).(1)
Fan, et al. treated 20 cases of depressive neurosis also with Xiao Yao Wan (12-18 grams/day). In addition, though, in this study patients with spleen deficiency were also treated with Gui Pi Tang (2-4 boluses/day), and patients with yin deficiency were also treated with Liu Wei Di Huang Wan (6-12 grams/day). A control group of 20 cases were treated with amitriptyline (50-100mg) and doxepin (50-100mg). Ten days constituted one unit of treatment for both groups. The results: after 1-3 units of treatment, the treatment group had 9 cases resolved, 6 significantly improved, 5 improved, and 1 without response, with a total effective rate of 85%; in comparison, the corresponding numbers for the control group were 2, 6, 4, 7, and 65% (P<0.01).(2)