First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential

The following contains computer software information you should know about internet security and the SiteAdvisor versus Norton Confidential. Read on if you or a loved one wants to surf the net safely by purchasing one of these software systems.


1. Introduction

A lot of dangers threaten you on the Internet--even when you're just browsing Web sites. McAfee's SiteAdvisor Plus, the for-a-fee sibling of the company's free SiteAdvisor product, and Symantec's Norton Confidential focus on protecting you while you interact with Web sites. SiteAdvisor, the cheaper of the two, protects against a wider range of threats, but its blanket approach to site blocking is a serious limitation. Norton Confidential targets phishing and has a password manager; unfortunately, it costs nearly as much as a full-blown security suite, which neither of these programs can replace.

I tested a prerelease version of Norton Confidential (version 1.0.0.2) and a final version of SiteAdvisor Plus (version 1.7.0.53). Both products use a color-coded safety rating to categorize Web sites you visit. As you surf, Norton Confidential places a large, oval indicator--green for good, red for bad--within a browserwide toolbar. SiteAdvisor's petite toolbar does the same for good and bad, and adds two more colors: Yellow indicates a questionable site, and gray indicates an unknown site.

Unfortunately, these programs only work with Internet Explorer 6 and later. In fact, with SiteAdvisor Plus enabled, you can't use Firefox at all. McAfee plans to support Firefox by the end of the year; Symantec says it's working on a Firefox version, but has not fixed a specific completion date for it.

2. Blocking Online Threats

The two products take different approaches to protecting you. SiteAdvisor Plus, like the free--and Firefox-compatible--version of SiteAdvisor, checks sites against a vast database of sites that McAfee has previously tested for adware, spyware, viruses, phishing, and spam. The primary reason to pay $25 for SiteAdvisor Plus is to get its Protected Mode, which blocks users from visiting sites coded red and yellow. Since yellow sites are only suspected as dangerous, possibly as a result of unverified user comments, blocking them en masse seems a bit draconian. I would be happier if SiteAdvisor Plus let you choose to limit the blocking to red sites only.

SiteAdvisor Plus also flags suspect URL links embedded in e-mail and chat clients. At press time, SiteAdvisor supported Yahoo Messenger, Windows Live Messenger, and Google Talk chat clients, as well as Outlook, Outlook Express, Gmail, Yahoo Mail, and Microsoft Live Mail (Hotmail) e-mail clients. Notably missing are AOL Instant Messenger and AOL Mail; McAfee expects to support the current versions of each by the end of year.

SiteAdvisor's Protected Mode will protect you from sites suspected of distributing adware and spyware, but Norton Confidential won't. That's because Norton Confidential focuses on blocking phishing sites that try to steal sensitive personal information. To accomplish that, it checks sites against its own previously conducted research; analyzes sites in real time; and watches for keylogging, screen capturing, and data mining. And whereas SiteAdvisor (paid and free) color-codes search results in Google, Yahoo, and MSN, Norton Confidential does not.

Accompanying Norton Confidential, a password manager called InfoVault stores and backs up online and application log-ins and passwords, using strong 1024-bit RC5 encryption. It automatically fills them the next time you visit the site, too. InfoVault worked perfectly with several of my e-mail, banking, and Web service accounts. But it had trouble with Bank of America's site, which uses two-step authentication.

In informal tests, both Norton Confidential and SiteAdvisor successfully blocked PhishTank.com's list of verified phishing Web sites. But whereas McAfee's blanket blocking flagged everything equally, Norton's messaging differentiated between known bad sites and suspected bad sites; you can choose to visit the latter if you want.

Neither product supplants your antivirus or antispyware program, which may (and probably does) contains antiphishing protection; the full security suites from both Symantec and McAfee have antiphishing components. And neither product blocked a Web site (linked from spam) that sold, shall we say, performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals, so they can't substitute for using common sense while surfing.

If you currently use either McAfee's or Symantec's Internet security suite, I'd skip both of these one-trick ponies, due to the overlap in protection. But if you're looking for a discrete antiphishing tool to protect you while banking or buying online, Norton Confidential wins my vote despite its high price. SiteAdvisor Plus's blocking is less sophisticated, and the informational benefits of SiteAdvisor are available in the free product.


McAfee SiteAdvisor Plus




Paid sibling to free tool blocks a wide variety of sites but doesn't yet work with Firefox.

List: $25
Current prices (if available)

Symantec Norton Confidential




Expensive product protects against phishing and offers password manager; no Firefox support.

List: $50
Current prices (if available)
Related Articles
- IT Security and CIO Career
We were extremely disappointed when we determined that we have suffered an unauthorized intrusion into our computer systems that process and store information related to customer transactions I can assure you that we are taking steps to safeguard confidential information.
- Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2007
- McAfee SiteAdvisor Offers Good Advice
- Does Your Security Suite Also Protect Your Privacy?
- Instant Messaging Safety and Security
- Image Backup Apps Become Vista Compatible
- PC Welt Looks at New Ad-Aware Anniversary Edition
- Symantec Norton Internet Security 2008
- Scandoo and SiteAdvisor Make Surfing Safer
- First Look: McAfee Internet Security 2007 and Symantec Norton Internet Security 2007
Regional Articles
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Alabama
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Alaska
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Arizona
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Arkansas
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential California
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Colorado
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Connecticut
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential DC
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Delaware
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Florida
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Georgia
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Hawaii
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Idaho
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Illinois
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Indiana
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Iowa
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Kansas
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Kentucky
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Louisiana
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Maine
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Maryland
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Massachusetts
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Michigan
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Minnesota
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Mississippi
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Missouri
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Montana
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Nebraska
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Nevada
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential New Hampshire
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential New Jersey
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential New Mexico
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential New York
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential North Carolina
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential North Dakota
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Ohio
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Oklahoma
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Oregon
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Pennsylvania
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Rhode Island
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential South Carolina
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential South Dakota
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Tennessee
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Texas
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Utah
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Vermont
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Virginia
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Washington
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential West Virginia
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Wisconsin
- First Look: SiteAdvisor Plus vs. Norton Confidential Wyoming

Rss   Delicious   Digg   Add To My Yahoo   Add To My Google   Bookmark   Search Plugin

Topics:
Advertising Family Home Services Real Estate Resources
Business Services Fashion Industrial Goods & Services Retail & Consumer Services
Career Financial Services Insurance Software
Cars Food & Beverage Internet Technology
Computer Hardware Franchise Legal Telecommunications
Construction Health Miscellaneous Trade Shows
Education Holidays Nightlife Travel
Entertainment Home Appliances Online Database Weddings
Environmental Home Electronics Pets World History