The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Minnesota

Increased reliance on information technology has made cyberspace the equivalent of our nation's nervous system. As a result, a healthy and secure cyberspace is essential to our economic and national security. The private sector plays a central role in securing cyberspace because it owns and operates the vast majority of our nation's infrastructures and the cyber systems on which they depend. Critical infrastructures are found in each of these sectors: agriculture, food, water, public health, emergency services, government, defense, industrial base, information and telecommunications, energy, transportation, banking and finance, chemicals and hazardous materials, and postal and shipping. Some of these are public, others are private. Behind all these sectors are hundreds of thousands of interconnected computers, servers, routers, switches, and fiber optic cables that allow them to work.

Local Companies

Petrus Business Consultants
(507) 455-2899
560 Dunnell Dr
Owatonna, MN
Aon Risk Management Services of Minnesota
(952) 656-8000
8300 Norman Center Dr
Minneapolis, MN
Community Enhancement and Organizing
(612) 827-8080
5218 11th Ave S
Minneapolis, MN
Staffing Dimensions
(763) 201-1320
3255 Fernbrook Ln N
Minneapolis, MN
Parent Provider Connection
(507) 455-2560
560 Dunnell Dr
Owatonna, MN
Great Lakes Management
(952) 476-7947
408 Parkers Lake Rd
Wayzata, MN
Elert & Associates
(651) 430-2772
140 3rd St S
Stillwater, MN
Brostrom David L Consulting Service
(651) 690-0690
Saint Paul, MN
Bab Consultants
(612) 341-4252
275 Market St Ste C24
Minneapolis, MN
Endurant Business Solution
(952) 294-2700
6385 Old Shady Oak Rd Ste 275
Eden Prairie, MN

The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership



By Stacey McDaniel

Increased reliance on information technology has made cyberspace the equivalent of our nation's nervous system. As a result, a healthy and secure cyberspace is essential to our economic and national security. The private sector plays a central role in securing cyberspace because it owns and operates the vast majority of our nation's infrastructures and the cyber systems on which they depend. Critical infrastructures are found in each of these sectors: agriculture, food, water, public health, emergency services, government, defense, industrial base, information and telecommunications, energy, transportation, banking and finance, chemicals and hazardous materials, and postal and shipping. Some of these are public, others are private. Behind all these sectors are hundreds of thousands of interconnected computers, servers, routers, switches, and fiber optic cables that allow them to work.

Several of these sectors have created protection plans to secure the critical information infrastructures that they own and operate, but that has been done independently of other sectors. The security plans that emerged from each sector provided the government with some insight into the scope and character of the challenges facing the United States. But that bit of insight only made the government realize how crucial it is to get the private sector actively working with the public sector to improve information sharing. Fortunately, there are efforts under way to do just that. Here are a few.

The hubs for sharing

To address that lack of communication and take a more holistic approach to securing the sectors, the government has called for the establishment of Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs), as first outlined in the Presidential Decision Directive in 1998, and again in the Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-7) of late last year. The Bush administration has said industry ISACs are to serve as the primary means for sharing information between government and the private sector. The ISACs are alliances formed within vertical industries and are designed to facilitate information sharing and collaboration to help better protect the economy.

Each ISAC is funded by its membership fees, and consists of a secure database, analytic tools, and information gathering and distribution facilities that allow authorized individuals to submit either anonymous or attributed reports about information and physical security threats, vulnerabilities, incidents, and solutions. ISAC members also have access to information and analysis about information security threats, vulnerabilities, incidents, and solutions provided by other members and obtained from other sources, such as the government and law enforcement agencies, technology providers, and security associations. ISACs also work closely with the Department of Homeland Security's National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) to exchange data about threats and vulnerabilities.

Prime ISAC example

One exemplary example of an ISAC is the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS/ISAC). Formed in 1999 in anticipation of Y2K, FS/ISAC is one of the first ISACs. In December, 2003, the Treasury Department signed a $2 million one-time contract to upgrade the FS/ISAC. That money will go towards enhancing the network so it can serve more than 30,000 institutions in the financial sector -- including banks, exchanges, insurance companies, and others -- in addition to its existing core members. The upgrades will include:

  • Introducing a secure, confidential forum for real-time information sharing

  • Adding data about physical threats to the cyber threat information that the center handles

  • Providing a Web-based warning and alerts service, with a backup system in case the Internet itself is affected

  • Setting up more than 16 performance metrics to determine the center's effectiveness and help assess the state of information sharing across the industry

The FS/ISAC has not only added security measures, it has set measurable goals, something other ISACs are also trying to do.

Challenges facing ISACs

The creation of "trusted partnerships" between the government and the private sector has been a struggle to date, as ISACs still lack the trust, openness, and spirit of cooperation needed to achieve true collaboration. Many in the private sector feel they must share sensitive security details concerning their respective sector, while the government is not fully sharing information with them in return. Lately, the government has made an effort to share more sensitive data gathered by intelligence agencies -- but not enough to satisfy many private sector companies. Of course, the hesitation to share information comes from both sides. A May 2003 General Accounting Office report found that companies are unwilling to divulge information to the government that could be used as evidence in antitrust suits or released to their competitors or the public under the 1966 Freedom of Information Act.

Another stumbling block for ISACs involves locating avenues of additional funding. Most ISACs, as business entities, are not fully financially sustainable. Although ISACs generally collect membership fees, that money is not consistently sufficient to cover the expenses of running the ISAC. Additional funds are needed for operations and activities that include analysis of terrorist activities, housing data, and performing research. This is a touchy subject because many private companies have committed significant time and money to supporting an ISAC, and they feel the government isn't reciprocating with enough funds from its end.

To address these problems, the Department of Homeland Security has set goals for improving information-sharing relationships, introduced methods for measuring progress toward these goals, and begun to look for ways to address the funding shortage some ISACs have experienced.

Task forces address cross-industry cyber security

Last December, five task forces were formed by public and private sector leaders under the guidance of the Department of Homeland Security. Each task force is charged with developing a plan for addressing common concerns from the two communities and presenting tangible proof that their plan is working -- in the form of various deliverables and metrics:
 
Awareness for Home Users and Small Businesses: Expand on existing outreach programs such as Stay Safe Online and Cyber Citizen.

Cyber Security Early Warning: Begin to develop a national cyber security response system, including implementation objectives for the U.S. Computer Emergency Response Team.

Best Practices and Standards: Corporate Governance: Establish guidelines and best practices for cyber security roles and responsibilities within organizational management structures.

Best Practices and Standards: Technical Standards and Common Criteria: Develop new tools, technologies, and practices, such as secure configuration guides, to reduce vulnerabilities across all sectors.

Security Across the Software Development Life Cycle: Secure Software: Find new methods to reduce vulnerabilities included in products during development, including determining how to teach building secure software.

An effort from the private sector

The Cyber Security Industry Alliance (CSIA) was started in February of this year by a group of leaders from major cyber security software, hardware, and services companies who believed that an association was needed that would focus full time on cyber security public policy issues. Here are the CSIA's goals for the first year:

  • Public policy: Monitor and influence legislation and government regulation at both the state and federal levels.

  • Education: Create programs in conjunction with leading academic institutions to develop curricula to close the skills gap.

  • Awareness: Develop and collaborate in multi-faceted awareness campaigns to raise the visibility of cyber security issues, challenges, and solutions among various audiences, including consumers and small businesses.

  • Standards: Identify and support emerging industry technology standards in partnership with other organizations.

The CSIA believes that cyber security is best addressed through market-driven forces; ideally, any standards developed should be through a voluntary partnership between the public and private sector. The CSIA has stated that it will work closely with the Department of Homeland Security on public policy initiatives over the coming year.

Conclusion

As recently as a couple of years ago, each sector of our nation's critical infrastructure had internal mechanisms for collecting and sharing information, but there was no coordination among them. As the government and many industry leaders have come to realize, collaboration is key to securing the backbone of our nation. Other private sector leaders are motivated to cooperate on information sharing initiatives because they see it as an alternative to being faced with formal regulations. Whatever the motivation, the growing partnership between public and private organizations manifested through the ISACs, task forces, and other alliances will enhance the flow of accurate and timely information about physical security threats, vulnerabilities, and incidents - information that is crucial when trying to secure a backbone built on technology.

Stacey McDaniel has been writing about high-tech issues for more than six years.

Featured National Company

NRG Global

213-383-6745
3807 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA
http://www.nrgglobal.com

NRG Global provides availability monitoring and performance management products and
services.

Use our products to monitor and manage your IT resources, including: servers, operating
systems, databases, applications, files, CPU's, memory, disks, and more.

Our flagship product is CleverEye. CleverEye is availability monitoring, alerting and reporting software. Automatically measure response time and trigger alerts when thresholds are broken. Easy to install, agent-less, and Web based, supports multiple concurrent users. Four powerful modules to monitor from different perspectives: network layer, application layer, SNMP and operating system. Monitor servers, websites, databases, applications, CPUs, memory, disk, FTP, DNS, LDAP and more.

We also provide consulting expertise to integrate our solutions.


Related Articles
- Protecting the Nation Minnesota
Information sharing among government agencies and the private sector has emerged as one of the most critical challenges of the post 9/11 era. A key element of this challenge is that while the federal government is expected to keep the U.S. secure, the overwhelming majority (85 to 90%) of the nation's critical infrastructure is not controlled by the federal government, but is privately held.
- The Municipal Wireless Dilemma Minnesota
- Public/Private Partnership Minnesota
- Remote Control Software and Today's IT Environment Minnesota
- Drive Traffic And Revenues Minnesota
- Maintaining Information Integrity in E-Government Minnesota
- The Botnet Threat Minnesota
- Upping the Ante for Public Sector CIOs Minnesota
- Recent Developments in Homeland Cybersecurity Minnesota
- Laptop Wireless Network in Windows Vista Minnesota
Regional Articles
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Albert Lea MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Andover MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Anoka MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Bemidji MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Brainerd MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Burnsville MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Champlin MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Chanhassen MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Chaska MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Circle Pines MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Cloquet MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Cottage Grove MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Detroit Lakes MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Duluth MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Eden Prairie MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Elk River MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Excelsior MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Faribault MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Fergus Falls MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Forest Lake MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Hastings MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Hibbing MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Hopkins MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Inver Grove Heights MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Lakeville MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Mankato MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Minneapolis MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Minnetonka MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Moorhead MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Mound MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership New Ulm MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Osseo MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Owatonna MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Prior Lake MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Red Wing MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Rochester MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Rosemount MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Saint Cloud MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Saint Paul MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Savage MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Shakopee MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership South Saint Paul MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Stillwater MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Wayzata MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Willmar MN
- The Growing Emphasis on Public/Private Partnership Winona MN
Related Articles
- Protecting the Nation Minnesota
Information sharing among government agencies and the private sector has emerged as one of the most critical challenges of the post 9/11 era. A key element of this challenge is that while the federal government is expected to keep the U.S. secure, the overwhelming majority (85 to 90%) of the nation's critical infrastructure is not controlled by the federal government, but is privately held.
- The Municipal Wireless Dilemma Minnesota
- Public/Private Partnership Minnesota
- Remote Control Software and Today's IT Environment Minnesota
- Drive Traffic And Revenues Minnesota
- Maintaining Information Integrity in E-Government Minnesota
- The Botnet Threat Minnesota
- Upping the Ante for Public Sector CIOs Minnesota
- Recent Developments in Homeland Cybersecurity Minnesota
- Laptop Wireless Network in Windows Vista Minnesota
Rate Article
     
Articles Insider

Rss   Delicious   Digg   Add To My Yahoo   Add To My Google   Bookmark   Search Plugin

Topics:
Advertising Family Home Services Software
Business Services Fashion Internet Technology
Career Financial Services Legal Telecommunications
Cars Franchise Miscellaneous Trade Shows
Computer Hardware Health Nightlife Travel
Construction Holidays Online Database Weddings
Education Home Appliances Pets World History
Entertainment Home Electronics Real Estate Resources