Vioxx Lawsuit Connecticut

On September 30, 2004, US drug company Merck announced the immediate withdrawal of its popular painkiller Vioxx. Citing an "increased relative risk for confirmed cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke" for the withdrawal, Merck soon received thousands of lawsuits.


1 . Local Companies

Reliable Bail Bonds
860 214 6515
24 Birch Street
Manchester, CT
The Law Office of Gail Hamaty Matthews
(203) 364-0173
261 South Main Street Suite 272
Newtown, CT
Law Office of Ann E. Rose, LLC
(203)304-1332
6 Nelson Lane
Newtown, CT
Brown, Paindiris & Scott, LLP
(860) 659-0700
2252 Main Street
Glastonbury, CT
Law Offices of Jennifer Laviano, LLC
860-350-4757
76 Route 37 South
Sherman, CT
USLEGALVISA.com
203-373-9080
4270 Main Street
Bridgeport, CT
Beatty & Beatty, LLC
203 453-4399
25 Boston Street
Guilford, CT
John T. Dillon, Attorney at Law
203 453-9190
64 Boston Street
Guilford, CT
Law Offices of Jason DeGenaro, LLC
203-453-4101
29 Water Street
Guilford, CT
Riefe Tietjen, Attorney at Law
203 453-0430
135 Church Street
Guilford, CT

2 . Vioxx Lawsuit Overview

Taken by around 20 million people, Vioxx was one of the leading arthritis painkillers on the market until its withdrawal in September 2004. To date, attorneys have filed over 10,000 lawsuits and 190 class action lawsuits across the US as a result of health implications and deaths allegedly caused by Vioxx.

Vioxx, also known as Ceoxx and Ceeoxx, was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 20, 1999. The active ingredient, Rofecoxib, was said to treat osteoarthritis, acute pain conditions, and dysmenorrhoea with far fewer side effects than similar drugs. However, what later emerged is that Vioxx could potentially cause serious cardiovascular problems, including heart attack and stroke.

The first lawsuit was won by the plaintiff in August 2005, with a Texas jury voting 10-2 to hold Merck liable for the death of a former user of Vioxx. This landmark case opened up the possibility of many more lawsuits against Merck, and indeed many more successful cases have since been filed. In anticipation of many legal battles, Merck has reserved $1.64 billion in its Vioxx legal defense fund. With only a small percentage of cases having come to court, it seems that there is still a very long road ahead for Merck and the alleged victims of Vioxx.

3 . Ernst v. Merck

The first of many cases against Merck in the Vioxx scandal, this case involved the widow of a user of the drug. Represented by Vioxx attorney, Mark Lanier, Ms Ernst filed the first Vioxx claim, which went to court in August 2005. The Texas jury found Merck to be negligent in the death of 59-year-old Robert Ernst and was ordered to pay $253.4 million. Mark Lanier is now considered to be one of the most successful Vioxx lawyers, and has gone on to represent more victims of the drug.

Robert Ernst had started using Vioxx eight months prior to his death and regularly participated in sports. The inquest into his death ruled that arrhythmia, or irregular heartbeat, was the cause - and this was attributed to Vioxx by the attorney. The case lasted five weeks, during which the twelve-member jury heard compelling evidence against Merck and their Vioxx drug. The Brazoria County jurors awarded the plaintiff $24 million in actual, or compensatory, damages, and then another $229 million in punitive damages, for a total of around $253 million. Merck lawyers, however, vowed to appeal the ruling stating that, "We believe that the plaintiff did not meet the standard set by Texas law to prove Vioxx caused Mr. Ernst's death."

4 . Class action refused

Following the revelations that Vioxx could have been the cause behind hundreds of its users’ heart attacks and strokes, many victims organized themselves into "class actions.” A class action lawsuit, under United States law, allows a number of people to pursue a case that asks common questions of law and fact. In simple terms, a class action allows a group of people to amalgamate their separate claims as one lawsuit against a common defendant. This kind of lawsuit is often used in the aftermath of airline accidents, public disasters, and other incidents involving many plaintiffs.

Following the landmark win of the first Merck Vioxx lawsuit, many alleged victims organized themselves into class actions, with joint representation against Merck. The benefits of these class actions resulted in lower fees from the Vioxx lawyers and stronger cases with combined evidence. However, in November 2006, Judge Eldon Fallon refused a request to combine 7,000 lawsuits into one single class action against Merck. Judge Fallon said that each of the lawsuits would needed to be filed separately as each case was unique, despite the fact that most victims had suffered either a heart attack or a stroke. This came as good news to Merck, who had, as of November 2006, won 7 out of 11 cases brought against them in Vioxx lawsuits.

5 . Featured Local Company

Reliable Bail Bonds

860 214 6515
24 Birch Street
Manchester, CT

Regional Articles
- Vioxx Lawsuit Ansonia CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Bethel CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Bloomfield CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Branford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Bridgeport CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Bristol CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Cheshire CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Danbury CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit East Hartford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit East Haven CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Enfield CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Glastonbury CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Greenwich CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Groton CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Guilford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Hamden CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Hartford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Manchester CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Meriden CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Middletown CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Milford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Naugatuck CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit New Britain CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit New Canaan CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit New Haven CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit New London CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Newington CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit North Haven CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Norwalk CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Norwich CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Plainville CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Ridgefield CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Rocky Hill CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Shelton CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Simsbury CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit South Windsor CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Southbury CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Southington CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Stamford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Storrs Mansfield CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Stratford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Torrington CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Trumbull CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Vernon Rockville CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Wallingford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Waterbury CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit West Hartford CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit West Haven CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Westport CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Wethersfield CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Willimantic CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Wilton CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Windsor CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Winsted CT
- Vioxx Lawsuit Wolcott CT
Related Local Events
Welcoming Meeting for Legislative & Government Relations Committee
Dates: 10/14/2009 - 10/14/2009
Location: Chamber Office
Southington, CT
View Details

The Legislative Committe Meeting
Dates: 9/9/2009 - 9/9/2009
Location:
Milldale, CT
View Details

Buildings NY co located with Green Buildings NY -Trade
Dates: 6/16/2009 - 6/27/2009
Location: Reed Exhibition Companies
Norwalk, CT
View Details

Rss   Delicious   Digg   Add To My Yahoo   Add To My Google   Bookmark   Search Plugin

Topics:
Advertising Family Home Services Real Estate Resources
Business Services Fashion Industrial Goods & Services Retail & Consumer Services
Career Financial Services Insurance Software
Cars Food & Beverage Internet Technology
Computer Hardware Franchise Legal Telecommunications
Construction Health Miscellaneous Trade Shows
Education Holidays Nightlife Travel
Entertainment Home Appliances Online Database Weddings
Environmental Home Electronics Pets World History