Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Connecticut

Reflecting the technological advances seen throughout American society, the federal government is increasingly relying on wireless networks in its communications infrastructure. And as with the rest of America, the ease of installation and convenience of wireless networks have allowed adoption before security issues could be properly identified and addressed.

Local Companies

Glass Doctor
(860) 956-8010
868 Maple Ave
Hartford, CT
Exhibit Management
(203) 544-1242
18 Indian Valley Rd
Weston, CT
Front Porch the
(203) 935-0263
1347 E Main St
Meriden, CT
Mpi
(203) 741-1023
22 Mapleview Rd
Wallingford, CT
Postal Commemorative Society
(203) 853-2000
Norwalk, CT
Seapony Llc
(860) 442-3007
14 Eugene Oneill Dr
New London, CT
Taylor Companies
(860) 249-7117
100 Pearl St
Hartford, CT
Mentor4
(860) 255-1003
30 Stanford Dr
Farmington, CT
Westport Company the
(203) 454-8330
21 Charles St
Westport, CT
Ferguson Marketing
(203) 483-4343
175 N Main St
Branford, CT


Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies



From the Editors of CIOSC

Reflecting the technological advances seen throughout American society, the federal government is increasingly relying on wireless networks in its communications infrastructure. And as with the rest of America, the ease of installation and convenience of wireless networks have allowed adoption before security issues could be properly identified and addressed.

But even as wireless devices -- including wireless laptops as well as new generations of mobile phones and handheld devices -- proliferate throughout the federal government, the security of wireless networks inside federal facilities is increasingly essential. Poorly controlled or ineffectively secured wireless networks can allow sensitive data, passwords, and other information to be easily intercepted by unauthorized users, including those with hostile intentions. Failure to secure wireless networks may also open federal networks to use by unauthorized personnel who, while they may not intend to harm the government, are making illegal use of federally owned resources for their own purposes.

To get a sense of the scope of the challenge, the Government Accountability Office recently completed a six-month study, conducted between September 2004 and March 2005. For the report, "Information Security Federal Agencies Need to Improve Controls over Wireless Networks" (GAO-05-383), the GAO analyzed the wireless security controls reported by each of the 24 government agencies operating under the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990, and physically assessed the security of wireless networks at six of those agencies.

Among the key findings of the report:

  • Federal agencies have not fully implemented key controls such as policies, practices, and tools that would enable them to operate wireless networks securely.
  • Security tests at six federal agencies (which the GAO did not identify) revealed insecure configurations of wireless equipment, unauthorized wireless activity, and "signal leakage."
  • Wireless security is a "serious, pervasive, and crosscutting challenge to federal agencies."

The central conclusion: "If these challenges are not addressed, federal agency information and operations will be at increased risk" at a time when the nation's reliance on wireless networks is growing rapidly.

A persistent problem

There have been warnings for some time that the federal government faced this significant vulnerability challenge. Prior to the GAO report, a 2004 investigation of federal agencies by Federal Computer Week (FCW) also found serious wireless vulnerabilities.

The FCW report found that federal agencies have data traveling unencrypted over their wireless networks, as well as wireless access points broadcasting signals that hackers could use to attack the network. The FCW investigation also uncovered rogue wireless access points on the campus of a large system integrator with multimillion-dollar contracts with the National Security Agency and the Internal Revenue Service.

As far back as 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology examined the security concerns surrounding the 802.11 wireless specification, Bluetooth, and handheld devices in order to provide federal agencies with guidance for establishing secure wireless networks. The NIST's recommendations for maintaining secure wireless networks included a warning that "agencies should not undertake wireless deployment for essential operations until they have examined and can acceptably manage and mitigate the risks to their information, system operations, and continuity of essential operations." The report also warned that "agencies should be aware that maintaining a secure wireless network is an ongoing process that requires greater effort than that required for other networks and systems."

Identifying the threats

The GAO report, co-written by the agency's information securities director and chief technologist, identifies a half-dozen serious threats to unprotected wireless networks.

  • Eavesdropping  The attacker monitors transmissions for message content. For example, a person listens to the transmissions on a network between two workstations or tunes in to transmissions between a wireless handset and a base station.
  • Traffic analysis  The attacker, in a more subtle way, gains intelligence by monitoring transmissions for patterns of communication. A considerable amount of information is contained in the flow of messages among communicating parties.
  • Masquerading  The attacker impersonates an authorized user and exploits the user's privileges to gain unauthorized access in order to modify data.
  • Replay  The attacker places himself between communicating parties, intercepting their communications and retransmitting them (this is commonly referred to as a "man-in-the-middle" attack).
  • Message modification  The attacker alters a legitimate message by deleting or modifying it.
  • Jamming  Attackers flood a wireless network with excess radio signals that prevent authorized users from accessing it.

Implementing comprehensive, flexible solutions

The GAO and NIST agree that there are basic steps, both organizational and technological, that the federal government should take quickly to provide basic security for its wireless networks. The greater challenge is how to meet the ever-evolving nature of the threats and to insure security follows the burgeoning expansion of wireless devices. Solutions and procedures must be put in place so that agencies can respond quickly -- and proactively -- to new threats or variations on known threats.

The first step -- already taken by the GAO in the instances of the 24 federal agencies it investigated -- is for each federal agency to gain greater control over its network infrastructure through asset inventory and the discovery, prioritization, and safeguarding of vulnerabilities. A vulnerability assessment solution can deliver automated, fast, and thorough assessments, plus prioritized remediation recommendations, enabling administrators to quickly identify those systems and applications most at risk and deploy countermeasures to proactively secure them before security breaches occur. A vulnerability assessment solution can also provide a comprehensive view of security and help protect critical systems on the network and perimeter. In addition, it allows organizations to proactively prevent the exploitation of potential breaches that threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of business systems.

Conclusion

Wireless networks offer a wide range of benefits to federal agencies, and clearly their use will only increase. But it remains an ongoing challenge to ensure that they are secure against intrusions, interceptions, and attacks.

 

Featured National Company

Cepoint Networks, LLC

603-883-7979
1W Otterson Street
Nashua, NH
http://www.cepoint.com

Regional Articles
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Ansonia CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Avon CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Berlin CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Bethel CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Bloomfield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Branford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Bridgeport CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Bristol CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Brookfield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Cheshire CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Colchester CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Danbury CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Darien CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies East Hartford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies East Haven CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Enfield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Farmington CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Glastonbury CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Greenwich CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Groton CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Guilford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Hamden CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Hartford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Madison CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Manchester CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Meriden CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Middletown CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Milford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Monroe CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Naugatuck CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies New Britain CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies New Canaan CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies New Haven CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies New London CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies New Milford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Newington CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Newtown CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies North Haven CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Norwalk CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Norwich CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Plainville CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Ridgefield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Rocky Hill CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Seymour CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Shelton CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Simsbury CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies South Windsor CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Southbury CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Southington CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Stamford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Storrs Mansfield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Stratford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Torrington CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Trumbull CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Vernon Rockville CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Wallingford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Waterbury CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Waterford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies West Hartford CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies West Haven CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Westport CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Wethersfield CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Willimantic CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Wilton CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Windsor CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Winsted CT
- Wireless Weaknesses in Federal Agencies Wolcott CT
Rate Article
     
Articles Insider

Rss   Delicious   Digg   Add To My Yahoo   Add To My Google   Bookmark   Search Plugin

Topics:
Advertising Entertainment Home Electronics Software
Business Services Family Home Services Technology
Career Fashion Internet Telecommunications
Cars Financial Services Legal Trade Shows
Computer Hardware Franchise Miscellaneous Travel
Construction Health Nightlife Weddings
Education Holidays Online Database World History
Educational Content Home Appliances Real Estate Resources